it's precisely true; but I get your gist. if you enjoy writing that much cloudformation then by all means have a good time!
You are pulling a straw man by implying that requires much cloudformation, which is completely unrelated. Besides, CF is a good example of how you can use two different syntax to describe the same information.
if so, leading with "just not true" contributed to this (which seems like a non-sequitur if you're not saying the claim is false)