Basic education that was provided for free in middle and high school?
Basic education that was provided for free in middle and high school?
Once you take this position, and from the outcomes we see all around us, its very easy to reach a conclusion that the edu system is failing as a large part of the population can't parse what they are being fed. And that includes highly educated people btw. Cause they land up on either side on any issue you pick.
But that's just wrong.
People constantly expect the education system to solve the problem (of info overload - so many facts that not all facts are equal as the article does a good job explaining). The education system was never designed to solve info overload.
And social media/news media/Google are designed to overload everyone.
We need a bridging of the two systems.
Google/social media/news media has to understand they are constantly serving second graders tenth grade problems. And pretending there won't be any consewuences.
The education system is atlest able to signal to a second grader he is in second grade and here is a path to tenth grade with feedback constantly being provided to ensure he stays on track if he wants to get to tenth grade.
These signals don't exist on the internet of 2018 or are drowned out by 2000 other signals.
Most people are busy, distracted, coping with their own life problems and with the minimum attention they have to spare are told to pick facts from a large buffet table. The tech world has reinvent what signals it's providing alongside those facts.
Cause the highly simplistic current signals of upvotes/view counts/likes/retweets etc are not enough.
I think the problem is deeper than any education system could reasonably be expected to fix.
I can't tell if you are trolling so tell me which is true?
A > B
B > A
Where only one is true, and you have no more information I have provided here.
This is what you seemed to dismiss with your statement about basic education.
Specific information is required to solve the problem, not general education.
C > D
I propose to you that you do not have enough specific information to answer this question, even if you had a PHD in mathematics.
This was already pointed out by another extremely patient commenter.
No, actually you don't. _That_ is the problem.
Here's the original comment I responded to:
---
>How is the average American going to figure out what the truth is?
Basic education that was provided for free in middle and high school?
---
This person's comment is that a simple black and white "basic education" solves the problem of "how is the average American going to figure out the truth?"
I disagreed with my initial comment stating that, education is simply not enough.
I have a good friend with a PhD, and he's believed some incorrect things before, and I showed him more data, and he agreed he was wrong.
So, no, just "having an education" doesn't automagically allow anyone to determine the "truth" of a matter.