> I really wonder why Y Combinator, as a clear thought leader in the technology start-up space, doesn't vocally support private offices more, given Graham's own unequivocal endorsement of them in an essay about foundational ideas about software productivity and quality.
> The same could be said about other topics beyond offices too.
I have wondered this, as well.
Although it's admittedly not entirely charitable, my best guess is that it's because, even to YC, appearances and "social proof" matter more than promoting engineering productivity.
Still, if startup success isn't actually predicated on the benefits that private offices would bring, then there's not much point in YC supporting them.
Sadly, I can't imagine there's anywhere near enough data. The best we'd likely find is cubes-versus-open.