I'd argue not. Microsoft required payment for licensing the OS, Google doesn't.
It's patently unfair for Google the invest in most of the R&D got everything Android and not even expect a return.
It's patently unfair for Google the invest in most of the R&D got everything Android and not even expect a return.
Both are bundling other products with it, that's the problem.
> - by preventing manufacturers from selling smart mobile devices running on competing operating systems based on the Android open source code;
Google's abdroid has 0% penetration in China