No mention of abortion in this article. Particularly relevant because Iceland has no kids with down syndrome because of it, and European countries are following their pattern.
This is completely irrelevant. This article gives a rating on f "mixed" to the claim that abortions have eliminated nated or reduced downs syndrome, and their only refutation is that abortion is not mandated. They say nothing about the general concept of eliminating a genetic illness with selective breeding (effectively) because selective breeding will always have profound effects on genetic traits. This is the very basis of evolution itself and without acknowledging it's validity, you deny evolution as a whole. Please don't post irrelevant links that seem to support a refutation of the topic at hand while actually it has nothing to do with it.
Do you mean forcible abortions? The article is not focused on voluntary sexual sterilization. It is focused on sexual sterilization of people tricked/forced into it or paid for it. So I don't see why the article should have mentioned abortions unless it is of the forcible kind.
I was quite surprised to find out that out of 58.205 births in Denmark in 2015, 15.325 had their pregnancies terminated with abortion. That is 20% (1 in 5) of all pregnancies which gets terminated.