Your link reminds me of those manila envelopes. Cargo cult science indeed!
It's almost as if your question is being interpreted as either:
1) as defense of the manila envelope (how is a question a defense?)
2) as indicating you are the author of the envelope (that probability would be incredibly low!)
3) as being written by the same author who made some other unliked comment in this topic (since when do we downvote all comments of an author as soon as we dislike one of his comments?)
But downvoting in the first place seems reasonable.
Not trying to attack the standard model here but rather showing interest in discussing a new approach.
1. Not prepared with LaTeX. 2. Photo of the author. 3. Obsession with rounded rectangles and ovals. 4. It uses the word "colossal" 83 times and "rupture" 110 times. 5. Didn't see any references to other scientific works.