New York’s last remaining independent bookshops
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
From the article:
> That extends to its bookshops, many of which have fallen to astronomically rising rents. St Mark’s Bookshop, for example, which opened in 1977 and became a sort of literary HQ for punks, was the oldest independent bookshop in Manhattan until it closed in 2016, despite celebrity support from Patti Smith and Salman Rushdie.
I'm confused. Isn't The Strand (just a few blocks away from St Mark's original location) an independent bookstore too? Wikipedia says it was founded in 1927 [1]. That was another bookstore that I visited frequently, though I would argue that it's reached a certain level of critical mass and success that makes it able to buck the general trend -- even if Amazon has a bigger selection and better prices, visiting The Strand is a worthwhile experience in itself. Similar to B&H Photo Video [2]
[0] https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/st-marks-bookshop-...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strand_Bookstore
[2] https://www.bloomreach.com/en/blog/2016/03/bh-photo-competes...
https://untappedcities.com/2015/08/26/4th-avenue-the-history...
That said, the bookstore sucked. It had far too few books per square foot - easily an order of magnitude or more less than the Strand - but their curation was, outside of political tracts, bland and unsurprising. I’d never walk in there and find the book I was looking for; I’d never walk in there and find an unexpected gem. You have to deliver at least one of those, and your curation had better be top notch if your position is “we will only stock a (relative) handful of books.”
They went out of business because they were bad at what they did, but great stores on the same block can’t cope with the rent either.
I think the bigger problem is jerks like me who go to bookstores to browse or use the restroom and then go home and order the books on amazon. Sadly, I just can't be bothered to carry the books home. I just can't.
> Ironically, that is resulting in plenty of retail vacancies.
Is this odd to anyone else? From the Manhattan mall to downtown to the UWS, I'm seeing as many vacancy signs today as I saw during the financial crisis 10 years ago. Strange to see so many vacancies in such a strong economy. Maybe it's that so much of economic commerce is going online. What's going to happen during a recession? Are all storefronts going to be banks and RiteAid/Duane Reade?
1. https://mymodernmet.com/ny-indie-booksellers-bohbot-ungar/ 2. http://www.franckbohbot.com/nyib
I think the full book including interviews is yet to be published.
I love that they included that woman on Astor Place though.
Definitely give Argosy a visit, you won't be disappointed. If you are a bibliophile and want to see the rare book offering on the 5th and 6th floors you can do so by simply making an appointment ahead of time. But even just visiting the other 3 floors is more than worthwhile. Cheers.
The story of how Kew & Willow came to be is also interesting: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1844468864/lets-bring-a...
I'm probably wrong (never talked to an insider) but owning just doesn't seem to be in the DNA of the store owners to go for that. A shame for them, and for the fate of the thousands of books that make them special in the first place.
You're replying to someone who wrote "40 years ago." Real estate in New York was cheap, back in the 1970s and early 1980s. I have friends who bought their brownstone in Brooklyn for $200,000, which is now worth $2 million. If you were lucky enough to buy real estate in New York in the early 1980s, it was among the best investments possible.
For awhile I lived in a 4 story building in Brooklyn, just across from the Navy Yard. It had 14 apartments in it. It was owned by a Hasidic Jew, who I got to know pretty well. He told me he bought it in 1982 for $300,000. I'd guess it is now worth $3 or $4 million.
I realize that the national story is different from the New York story, but those bookstores could have bought their buildings, when real estate values crashed, back at the end of the 1960s.