Parallel Index Scans in PostgreSQL | Hacker News Reader

Parallel Index Scans in PostgreSQL

amitkapila16.blogspot.com

111 pointsamitkapila8 comments

Parallel scans while great for performance, I found them hard to tune considering how they work with `work_mem`, `max_connections`.

The issue is that when a parallel scan starts, it's not limited to the `work_mem` which you would expect per connection. Instead, every parallel worker gets it's own `work_mem` limit. On a very busy db you can quickly end up with lots of OOM errors. What you end up doing is either disable all parallel scans or reduce `work_mem` which sometimes results in slower query performance for non-parallel queries. Suffice it to say, I wasn't smart enough to tune them and just disabled the parallel scans. Another way to do it is set a higher `work_mem` for expensive queries while having a generally low `work_mem`, but that's just hard to get right and you end up with even more bookkeeping.

This behavior might have changed. If anyone knows more about this would be glad to hear what you've done.

Agreed. It might be nice to have separate work_mem settings for single-process and parallel queries, or perhaps even just divide the single-process query work_mem by the number of workers that will be used. The number of OoMs that start popping up just because someone turns on parallelism is embarrassing.

I don't have any solution for this problem, but one thing to note is that if you set the appropriate value of work_mem in the session that runs the parallel query, the same will be used by parallel workers.

The problem I see with this approach is that you don’t know when the planner is going to decide to use parallel scans meaning that you might get worse performance for non parallel queries.

That's right, but you can manage if you know which query is going to take parallel plan (using explain). You can set it before that query execution and reset once query is executed. I understand that this can't be a generic solution, it can help only in a limited set of cases.

recent experience (yesterday) with Postgres 10 from the PGDG repo for Ubuntu.. reading indexes plus data from a 30GB database for analytics on a four-core i5 consumer motherboard with "spinning rust" disks, parallel configs set in postgresql.conf, and shared_mem of about 6GB, the reads from disk are consistantly 30-40 percent faster for the larger tables, with no change in the smaller tables.. (it is easy to see the parallel workers in htop) Great feature from PostgreSQL Global Development Group!

Excited for this. I have quite a few queries which would benefit. The work has been amazing over the past few years (and really even further back).

Thanks.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com