I personally identify with his writing, in a sort of "game recognizes game" way.
Edit: I'll add that I think Fred Wilson's reasoning is convincing, and written for the people of planet Earth to boot. Even the original article states that some of the people were just there to see what's up. If they're already spilling beans to Techcrunch, the likelihood of managing to get everyone on board with anything really damaging for any significant duration is small.
You might not like it, but I think the juxtaposition of hard-nodes business insight and MySpace typography is jarring, in a positive sense. He routinely craps all over the industry.
But what do I know. I am a 30 year old with a mohawk.
Certainly. Is he aiming for "great literary figure" status, though? My guess is that in 50 years, people will still read the work of "great authors". A rant about a silicon valley "conspiracy"? My guess is no.
How many other investors can you recognize by their prose and style? how many do you talk about afterward?
I think the point has been made.
Paul Graham comes to mind:-)
Breaking rules _for the sake of breaking them_ is extremely childish.
"
"Rebellion is almost as stupid as obedience. In either case you let yourself be defined by what they tell you to do. The best plan, I think, is to step onto an orthogonal vector. Don't just do what they tell you, and don't just refuse to."
Did a google for that quote to find out that it's pg in this article http://www.paulgraham.com/hs.html