Dissastisfied, Some Wall Street Technologists Flee for Start-Up Life
observer.com
observer.com
But even quants are not immune to the feeling that what they're doing for a living is not adding up to anything.
Not sure about this, but isn't the quants who are responsible for developing new pricing models for some esoteric options, new algos to capture the fleeting abnormalities in the market , improving (say) the existing Gauss Copula method that so that 2007 subprime crisis could be predicted or being avoided altogether (http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-03/wp_quant) and so on.How can you say that kind of work is unsatisfying and lacking of creativity?
For me, it's much more important to firstly earn good money, secondly do something creative, not just typical CRUD applications.
And whether or not a work has "social redeeming value" is highly subjective. I, for one, don't think that Twitter has any bit of "social redeeming value". I can't see how a 140-char limit sentence can add much to our society.
I never worked full time at a bank, but I did a summer internship in Goldman's tech division and the work was extremely boring. I didn't really get the impression that anyone on my team was having fun, with the possible exception of my manager. I'm sure there are some tech jobs at the big banks which are fun, but I think they're the minority.