Wynton Marsalis says rap/hip-hop ‘more damaging than a statue of Robert E. Lee’
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Many of his peers and people who have played in his bands have been active participants in the hip hop community for decades.
If you look at what jazz as a method of social activism and a way to speak about the state of life in black america in the past century, thats really what hip hop is doing now.
Hip hop talks about drug use/violence etc because its whats happening in the communities that the music comes out of.
Jazz at its most important points in history was often fraught with musicians who were heavily addicted to drugs, abused woman, caught up in violence etc (just look up the issues some of the greats dealt with like Miles Davis, Charlie Parker, etc)
Hip hop and jazz are fundamentally two extremely similar traditions of music born out of the same realities of the black american experience and for Wynton to being making comments like this is extremely disappointing
He went from social activist rapper to rapper-gang member and it got him killed.
That doesn’t mean that it’s the music itself but the effect it has on the culture. And anyone arguing that music doesn’t affect culture is clearly wrong.
Movies do it too. A movie like “Zero Dark Thirty” that glorified torture is hurting the culture too. People in the military watch it and it changes their outlook for the worse.
It’s a hot button issue but that doesn’t mean your impulsive reaction is correct, just because you didn’t let the movie or music damage you directly.
Eminem had no social advantages and he got caught up in the thug life that Tupac (specifically) inspired.
That is a painfully simplistic summary of Tupac's life story.
You really should dig a little deeper before making such proclamations.
Then you should know better than most what's wrong with your statement.
But, it seems that you misunderstood much. Look more carefully and you might gain a new appreciation for a life that you currently seem to believe is most accurately summarized as a descent into some sort of thug darkness.
You may say not all rap is this way but the truth is that most popular rap is this way.
That's correct.
>but the truth is that most popular rap is this way.
Why is this the case? I mean, doesn't it make you wonder whether it's the music or our culture overall that is the real problem?
On the other hand, it's also a useless comparison. Because there isn't just one statue of Lee. Comparing the damage from all of the confederate memorials, and confederate flags, and confederate holidays, and everything named after slave owners... well, suddenly that's not quite so clear a comparison. But a whole lot more relevant.
And then when you look at the opposites—what's the sum benefit from rap/hip-hop? And then compare that to the sum benefit of everything in this country that praises slave-owners—or those that killed Americans in defense of slave-owning—that's not even close anymore.
who had a few rappers, albeit not mainstream or crass ones
ps: branford
Make the case that hip-hop is more damaging than a statue of Robert E. Lee? Exactly how would anyone make such a case?
The answer is that no one can prove it one way or the other. That and the fact that the statement even suggests that's a debate we ought to be having is exactly what makes it absurd.
Both can be problems. How does an intractable debate about which is worse help anyone?