Yeah, but they get to be alive. That would not be the case if they weren’t useful to humans.
Think about how different this could look: https://xkcd.com/1338/
1. Those particular animals would not be alive. I was replying to a comment about the quality of life of those particular animals.
2. Regarding the point that other animals would take their place: isn’t this an argument against veganism? Life in a state of nature is brutal and not at all what I would classify as clearly better than life under domestication.
That being said, I still believe that we have some kind of a moral obligation to provide the animals in our care with a decent quality of life.