True. And you have children. Better to exist than not exist.
You're both violating the community standards here (by calling people idiots) and really reaching by suggesting that a methodological paper about inferring information from C. elegans literature is somehow a clear rebuttal to the parent post.
Community sometimes has very little to do with what's true.
Hm, what an absolutely dimwitted and obtuse "scientist". I hope your career crashes and burns. You want to be heard? Make yourself a pleasure to be heard. I cannot believe you got anyone to work with you.
Yes. Also true is that toxic dialog does not move the discussion forward.
This guy sounds like a bot using some sort of generative NN with "toxicity" turned up to 11
Bingo, in part. We're also trying to determine who does not value existence.