> It would allow Zuckerberg to talk more candidly.
This is exactly the problem. If he's not able to talk candidly in public, it suggests that Facebook is doing things to which the public would object.
This is exactly the problem. If he's not able to talk candidly in public, it suggests that Facebook is doing things to which the public would object.
In the same post, this is a very good counter-point, I think. Anything this high-profile will be cherry-picked and de-contextualized a million times. Including in Facebook posts, ironically. Speaking candidly is bad PR for anyone that visible, no matter how virtuous.