I don't see the "political corruption"" angle.
The rest (your distortions aside) was already addressed by him and the company on many occasions still the animus directed at him is extraordinary.
The rest (your distortions aside) was already addressed by him and the company on many occasions still the animus directed at him is extraordinary.
'Damian Collins, the chair of the DCMS committee, said: “We asked them to look for evidence of Russian influence and they came back and told us something we now know appears misleading. And we’re still waiting for answers to 40 questions that Mike Schroepfer was unable to answer, including if they have any record of any dark ads.
“It could be that these adverts are just the tip of the iceberg. It’s just so hard getting any sort of information out of them, and then not knowing if that information is complete.” ' from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/12/facebook-...
Or do they not fit your narrative?