I hope more scientists, specifically those in the public eye, don't blatantly berate philosophy "because they can't do experiments on important questions".

The incident that jumps to memory involves the science "popularizer" Lawrence Krauss, who berated (although he has issued a non-apology) a philosopher of physics, David Albert, for critically reviewing Krauss's book:

In response to a critical review by philosopher of physics David Albert, Krauss called Albert a “moronic philosopher” and told the Atlantic’s Ross Andersen that philosophers are threatened by science because “science progresses and philosophy doesn’t”.

Peter Woit, Senior Lecturer in the Mathematics department at Columbia, discusses (although, it is roughly six years old now) that here[1], with references. Here[2] is a comment from that same blog post sharing "examples of contributions from philosophy to progress in physics".

Don't mean to single out Krauss on that; of course there are other well-known scientists too.

[1] https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=4623&cpage=...

[2] https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=4623&cpage=...