Definitely agree it's potentially narrow, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Definitely agree it's potentially narrow, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
One of the signs of how developed a subfield of a science is is how easily it can be taught to non-experts.
Also ethical review boards for other areas of science are very well established, and it's not unrealistic to imagine that extending towards machine learning as well.
The main issue is that a lot of people do not take away the intent, or can fully answer questions correctly about the intent but not actually care. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Someone I knew in college made bank writing papers for engineers' in those ethics courses.
Being a practitioner for Deep Learning, the bar is actually lower than being a proficient, compiler or database programmer.