Intel Threatens to Sue Anyone Who Uses HDCP Crack
wired.com
wired.com
Of course, every HD movie ever released was already ripped and on TPB before HDCP was broken, so I really fail to see how this crack impacts Intel in any way. HDCP's weak link was the software anyway:
Blu-Ray Player: OH HAI, video card. Encrypt the video signal, kthx.
Video Card: Yeah, OK, that's turned on now.
Blu-Ray Player: Excellent. Here's the unencrypted HD video stream that I trust you to keep secure.
Video Card: *uploads to The Pirate Bay*What it does impact is the possibility for hardware devices with unlicensed HDMI inputs. This is primarily useful for people with early HD TVs that didn't support HDCP (or didn't have HDMI/DVI at all), or an owner of an HD projector (many of which have no or bad HDCP implementations.) It would also theoretically be useful for creating a custom DAC or video processor.
Anyway, with Intel threatening to sue, this means only the Chinese will create HDCP strippers. But that's all that's needed for any usage.
Would they be much better than the audio recording I'd get by plugging my recorder into the headphone output port of my TV?
Is there a MITM attack against HD technologies that works without breaking encryption?
Please enlighten someone who is not up to speed with his disk security circumvention.
(Yes, it's more involved than this, but the point is... if your computer has the raw bits, you have the raw bits.)
Also, what is "decryptBlock"? some kind of vendor specified memory region for storing security routines? ;-)
And it's such news!