Man Forbidden from Identifying Twitter Shaming Activist,Court Order Seems to Say
reason.com
reason.com
Such online shaming does not disappear. Permanantly ruining someone's reputation in spite of bad behavior being an isolated mistake or not reflective of the the type of person that person has become is cruel and unproductive.
Ok, there is a woman Lindsey Middlecamp, who has a twitter account [1], where she 'calls out' men overly concerned about womenfolk not dressing chastely enough.
Here's a fun tweet: https://twitter.com/CardsAgstHrsmt/status/986304355753185281
Ok, so this women believes that women should be able to dress as sexy as they want without fear of reproach. So far, so good. God bless Lindsey Middlecamp!
The reason she comes across as a wacko is because she seems to think male toplessness is the equivalent of female toplessness. It's not. Women will not pay money to see men topless.
Then, as alleged by Mr. Fredin, she launched an anonymous attack against Mr. Fredin, falsely accusing him of rape.
Mr. Fredin, a bit piqued, responded by unmasking his anonymous harasser, Ms Middlecamp, and gave her a little payback.
Ms Middlecamp went to court and got the court to grant her an order, preventing Mr. Fredin from letting anyone know that Lindsey Middlecamp is the person behind @CardsAgstHrsmt.
That last part is the constitutionally-suspect part.