Hacker News Reader

I agree with RMS's pro-choice opinion, but I honestly see no reason a 20-something year old joke about abortion needed to remain in the documentation.

The consensus was that it be removed. It was removed. Just because HMS is a FOSS legend doesn't make him God.

View on HN

> Just because RMS is a FOSS legend doesn't make him God.

According to RMS he does have ultimate authority over all GNU packages, including Glibc: https://lwn.net/Articles/753661/

He probably owns some root certs. Likely if he were to start exercising such authority without being an active developer, there would be a fork soon enough.

Isn't that what happened to emacs?

A few times, but so far GNU has held on.

It happened with GCC. Today's GCC is actually a fork of the original, which became the "blessed" version once the forkers and RMS worked out resolved some issues that led to the fork.

The unforked (for lack of a better term) GCC was set aside, and the fork became the official version.

Just for the sake of completeness: the EGCS fork you are talking about was alive 1997-1999.

Fork, take maintainers and contributors with you, convince others to use your fork.

Yes I'm 100% with you on this. I mainly dislike how the LWN article is framed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com