-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64K 2010-08-20 23:44 kvm-amd.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 86K 2010-08-20 23:44 kvm-intel.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 478K 2010-08-20 23:44 kvm.ko
qemu-kvm and libvirt based stuff with a community support? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64K 2010-08-20 23:44 kvm-amd.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 86K 2010-08-20 23:44 kvm-intel.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 478K 2010-08-20 23:44 kvm.ko
qemu-kvm and libvirt based stuff with a community support?Vmware works very well, has top notch clone/backup/rollback feature, can automatically install tons of different OS. That's a real time saver.
I use kvm at work where we don't have vmware licenses, and while it does work nicely, there is still no working rollback that I know of, and the network configuration is a PITA in general. Vmware frees me from all that hassle that I frankly don't want to deal with.
The idea is about reducing complexity and reusing community-tested solutions, not creating a new layer of complexity with a coded in a rush, badly tested poorly documented closed-source layer.
btw, if I use native lvm I can get a lot of flexibility.
edit: some BS removed.
btw, there is still no x86_64 xen-host for a modern kernels.
Concerning things coded in a rush, I cannot say about vmware, but libvirt and the associated tools certainly are far from mature in my experience, at least for an end user.
Btw, there is an issues with last updates of qemu-kvm in Fedora 13. beware.
If you are tenacious and patient enough to make it past the first tier of support, you will get your crashed server fixed, possibly faster than it would take to wait for an answer on a mailing list.