We're looking at a pretty substantial surplus for this year's budget, which will be finalized in June, and lawmakers have different ideas about what to do with it. Governor Brown wants to put it in the rainy day fund, conservatives largely want to enact tax relief for some Californians, and the state's liberal politicians largely want to spend it on other things.
Personally, I'd like if California used at least the bulk of it to pay down some of our unfunded liabilities with regards to pension programs, of which we still have about $275 billion (of over $400 billion in total debt). There are plans to take care of these over the next 3 decades, but settling it a bit earlier never hurt.
the last few years under governor Brown have led to a budget surplus for those years
no, it wasn't a surplus. 2017 showed a $1.6 Billion deficit[0].[0] http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-jerry-brown-budge...
For completeness, CA roughly carried a deficit from '02-'03 to '12-'13, and then roughly a surplus from '13-'14 onwards, except for 2017.
There is an underfunded pension but the payments aren't due for many years in the future.
California has a surplus now.
What budget year are you talking about, where an actual surplus was evident when the budget year closed?Projections are just projections and can be seriously wrong. A projected $2.8 billion surplus[0] quickly changed to being a $1.6 billion deficit[1].
[0] https://www.scpr.org/news/2016/11/17/66216/california-analys...
[1] http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-jerry-brown-budge...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jerry-browns-legacy-a-6-1-billi...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jerry-browns-legacy-a-6-1-billi...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/jerry-browns-legacy-a-6-1-billi...
California GDP: $2.7 trillion
I think California will be fine.
(Though, in the end, I agree with you.)