Hacker News Reader

I wonder if their attempt to force HTTPS everywhere (by shaming HTTP-only sites as insecure in Chrome) fits into this strategy.

It would put net neutrality violators like US ISPs out of the mass surveilla- ..eeeh advertising business, so I guess that is a good thing.

View on HN

I feel this one is highly positive enough to give them leeway. There are many types of browsing data, my porn habits as an egregious example, that I would prefer be constrained to a minimum number of entities.

Think driven to keep people safer and the same with Project Zero. A safer digital world and people will use more and Google then makes more money.

My gripe with the broader industry is that Google is finding a lot more of the big vulnerabilities than their competitors.

Should be a lot more balanced. I can not even think of one major one found by Apple. Yet Google has found so many of the really big ones. Today see an article they found additional.

What exactly should Google do differently here, when they find bugs in other companies products?

The point is spending the money to find them.

I personally believe MS should have done this years before Google.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com