Could you explain what part of their code of conduct ( https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/docs/CodeOfC... ) is racist or sexist?
A person who broke the CoC by snickering at the repeated use of the word dongle; unless a permanent ban is the result, the accused can not appeal any remedial actions taken against them. They are not even guaranteed to offer their side of the story in the investigation.
This CoC, like most, puts the power entirely in the hands of the accuser; it is very much the open source equivalent of a "binding arbitration" clause.
> reporting guide doesn't say anything
That's part of the problem: explicit behaviors are not called out, only the effect they have on the accuser matters.
By which you mean there's exactly one instance of it having happened in a completely different community (a Python conference) with a different CoC?
What the tee total f...
The discussion on lobste.rs was actually really good.