The secret to 4 letter domains: include one (and only one) digit
semmyfun.blogspot.com
semmyfun.blogspot.com
This doesn't matter for domains like al3x.net, but it does matter for domains like ftw1.com. There will inevitably be users that try to go to ftwone.com (and possibly ftwwon.com as well).
It shouldn't be completely surprising. The more characters (c) than digits (d) in a name, the more options available. 3c1d has more options (26x26x26x10=175760) than 4d (10x10x10x10=10000).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorial
EDIT: And also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_theory
i don't think factorial is relevant here: combinatorially, factorial represents the process of sampling without replacement: so if you were to be able to only use each letter once in each domain, then you would get 26!/4!26! possibilities for 4c.
this is combinatorics: the art of advanced counting, not probability, really.
...something which has not worked out so well for many economies. I don't want to make it illegal or anything - although I could live with some sort of -use-it-or-lose-it clause that kicks in after a year, and which proved a decent rule of thumb in the real world. Indeed, the term 'squatting' in relation to real estate describes gaining ownership by continuous occupation of property - which is a lot more work than going to the public records office and writings 'dibs!' on the land register.
Domain squatting is just a waste of productive resources, based entirely on the hope of extracting an economic rent from someone else later; and that rent is in proportion to the productive use a site developer (not the squatter) could make of a given domain name. The only investment squatters make in a domain name is usually to stick an ad page on there and track accidental visitors, which may give a useful data point to the buyer; but even then, the buyer is almost certainly not purchasing the domain because of such random traffic. Although registering a domain has a nominal cost, it's not really an investment in any economic sense; indeed, an ad-farm or 'coming soon' page on a domain which receives any significant amount of random traffic is polluted before it becomes branded, albeit very lightly and in a fairly harmless way. The rational economic price for a domain you own which is not making any money is the cost to date of holding the domain plus $1. Any profit beyond that is predicated on the buyer's project being sufficiently advanced and well-capitalized that writing a large check to the squatter is less painful than picking a different name.
The only economic benefit I've ever heard a squatter claim to justify their asking price was that they had made it uneconomical for someone to put porn there. Can you imagine this if domains were actually real estate? 'Yes, I do want a million dollars for this barren patch of desert with a weatherbeaten billboard and a cow skull - you should be grateful there ain't a saloon or a whorehouse here already.'
Those 'accidental' visitors are actually quite 'regular.' A certain stream of people type in domain names to find what they want every day. Just because you don't behave a certain way to navigate to things doesn't mean others don't. It's called Direct Navigation in the industry. That's what has fueled the growth of domain investing since about 2003ish when PPC parking systems actually created an easy to monetize method for domain holders that scaled incredibly well across virtually all niches. Google pumped it even higher until about 2007.
Those people who directly navigate to a website are amazingly consistent. I have held names for many many years and the type in numbers have remained almost constant for most of them. What is the value of X potential customers coming to you without any work every day? What is the value of a more memorable brand name? What is the value of a domain that is an exact match to a super high value keyword term that defines an industry and google puts a giant bonus on in SERPs?
Very few domain sales ever reach the million dollar mark and especially not new registrations (http://ohashi.info/article/there-money-fresh-domain-name-reg...). You're confusing a billboard in the middle of nowhere and a billboard in times square. The value of the billboard is the distance from times square. There are a lot of unreasonable people, but that's life, there are just as many professionals who know what their domains are worth. Just because you have one value doesn't mean others don't see the value differently.
How is it less valuable if the purchaser wants to make $100 from selling the domain versus making $100 on it selling trinkets?
I own a lot of domains that I may or may not do something with in the future. What should the cutoff point be? Should I be penalized after my 10th domain? 30th? 100th?
(I don't like squatters in general, but that doesn't mean I think they should be outlawed.)
Obviously it's hard to come up with a definition of what should and what shouldn't be allowed because chances are that it would be either unfair, easily circumvented or both. None the less, I believe there should be some way to take away domains from obvious squatters.
(And also, via inflating a property bubble, in no small part responsible for current economic difficulties.)
These are all bought and paid for. Each and every one of them was bought with a specific reason in mind, and even though I may never develop all of them (highly likely) at least I don't have to go and pay a ton of money for a good name.
I rarely sell domains, but when I do it's usually worth it (gameplay.com for instance).
I better go check my registrar account because someone must have broken in and put a useless domain name in there... I hate it when that happens.
Make it like $30 / year... price out tasters.
Fancy URLs for personal use can be reason I suppose. http://al3x.net/ comes to mind.
First of all, don't assume the domains are unused. You have no way of knowing this. I have domains that are critical to my infrastructure but don't necessarily have a web site (or even public DNS records). I'll never sell them. I have others that are look-alike domains that aren't activated in order to prevent conflict with my other domains. I'm unlikely to sell these, either.
Secondly, and this is really important, make your offer as professional and informative as possible. I never reply to offers from freemail addresses that amount to something like, "Hey, I'm interested in buying a domain that you don't appear to be using for an awesome project I'm working on. Please reply ASAP. George". You don't have to divulge your business model, but at least include the name of the domain you're interested in, your FULL name, a phone number, and preferably a company name and/or related URL. Consider including your offer in the email, since it's more likely to get a response if it's at all worth considering. Serious offers are much more likely to get a reply, even if it's to say, "Sorry, not interested."
If you call and leave a message, include the same information. But keep in mind that I probably won't return a long distance call, so consider saying that you'll call back at a certain time, and do it. This will help to show that you're seriously interested.
Whatever you do, don't file a complaint with the registrar or try to initiate an unauthorized transfer. This will only annoy the domain owner and could destroy your credibility.
Finally, understand that the domain owner has no obligation to respond to your offer in any way. If you really want a response, follow up a couple of weeks later, and be prepared to make a serious offer. If you don't want to be considered a pest, stop after 3 attempts and give it a reasonable long rest before trying again (6 months to a year).
How does this work? I'm not following you. It would seem that the less people/systems that know about a name, the less critical it is.
I've used domain names with no public DNS for corporate Active Directory domains. They might have a different domain for their website, but by registering it you are covered.
Always specify the domian name and make your outreach email as professional and formal as possible. I never include an actual offer so I can at least get them to reply (if you offer too little, they may not even reply). I never discuss the reason for purchase. The first email is only to determine their interest and start the dialogue.
If they fail to respond in a week (it takes time), I call the phone number listed on the whois record and try the personal touch.
I put up the Web 2.0 Validator site: web2.0validator.com (now on vacation until I get around to updating some code).
Interestingly, someone wrote to me asking how I managed to get such a domain; I pointed out the domain is simply 0validator.com, nothing magical.
Which of, course, means I can plan on web3.0validator.com :)
See the reasoning behind the switch from del.icio.us to Delicious.com:
So why did we switch to delicious.com? We’ve seen a zillion different confusions and misspellings of “del.icio.us” over the years (for example, “de.licio.us”, “del.icio.us.com”, and “del.licio.us”), so moving to delicious.com will make it easier for people to find the site and share it with their friends.
I always liked the hack (I still us it; it's shorter), but I'm obviously not an average user. You are completely right that being "clever" in your domain (or really anything regarding your product) is often not a great plan.
Remember that nobody had really done domain names like that (maybe cr.yp.to? i also have had burri.to for 15 years...) in a big way before, so it wasn't clear that it was a bad idea at the time.
Some of the other domains, like http://delicio.us/ worked correctly too. I wonder if Yahoo! kept them all.
If I was starting over, I'd pick something else.
// I'm still jealous of Matt Mullenweg's personal domain though: ma.tt is a pretty awesome domain hack.
If you look at the YC list it looks like at least half the YC startups would fail the radio test: https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?key=t_toYuVyy6fci0MAiIa...
If you must, the real secret to 4 letter domains is backordering as they expire or making an offer to existing owners.
bluh.org, a great website name for pointless nonsense!
I suspect where the 1 digit is makes a big difference LLLD being a decent combo or DLLL but LDLL or LLDL are probably almost all garbage.
(and before I get accused of squatting... we good is the name of an company I'll be opening after my current employment, thought om.gd will be perfect of url shortening with a twist... wait and see. whi.im is for 'things to do suggestions that poll your friends' ... lots of ideas planned at the moment just not got names for the others.
jjcm.org
What you see now is people who didn't renew their 4 letter .com domains...
And for those who are down voting me, here's the proof:
http://www.namepros.com/short-domain-discussion/161235-llll-...