Why Apple mice suck, and what they could do to fix it.
troysimpson.co
troysimpson.co
The 2 finger slide to scroll, 3 finger slid to page up / down, 2 finger right click make it an amazing tool. My productivity has skyrocketed on the track-pad. They have now released a peripheral track-pad for desktop machines. I recommended to a friend of mine that I freelance with and he was sold almost instantly. It is night and day.
Anyway, the point is I agree mice may be the one area where I prefer Microsoft's offerings to Apple's. I have never met an Apple mouse that I liked, but for me the mouse is dead I could never go back after using the track-pad.
Link for those of you unfamiliar with it:
I wonder how long it will be before Apple stops making mice entirely and switches completely to touch-based input. I suspect that time is not far away.
One of the main things i dislike is it not naturally being on my right, obviously all laptop makers couldnt do this because of the lefties of the world. The other issue is the actual size of the trackpad on a laptop, its too small, again, not easily fixable on a laptop.
So i suppose the external trackpad would solve both these problems, but until i try it out, i'm not sure if i'd like it or not. Certainly interesting though.
I know this sounds like fanboyism, but that's just been my experience. FWIW, I agree completely that Apple's actual mice are awful.
Another poster mentioned above that they slowly realized that they stopped using their mouse, that is what happened to me as well. One day I realized that I just never pulled my mouse out of my bag anymore.
I really think Apple has done a poor job of marketing this one, as I think most that have used it would agree, it is a mouse killer.
I do 3D work as a hobby from my old simulation days, and now days I use Blender, the pan, room, rotate is so natural with a trackpad it is unbelievable. And for Photoshop it is a huge productivity booster.
It is also nice in an IDE where I spend most of my time because you can navigate select and modify all in single hand stroke. If they ever add gestures for copy / paste I won't know what to do with myself.
I absolutely love the 3-finger drag. Use it all the time. With BetterTouchTool I now have 3-finger clicks for middle-clicks, and 4-finger swipes for Spaces. Tons more gestures are possible, but this is enough for my purposes.
Having the touchpad off to the side rather than in front of the keyboard makes all the difference in the world. I quickly found myself more productive on it, then on my venerable Kensington Expertmouse trackball (which is now reserved for games).
The one that was killing me was not being able to set gestures because I would love to have copy / past. I can have it now.
Apple mice suck. Period. They're practically unusable, poorly tested, unreliable, overly expensive garbage. Problems with their pointer devices are noticeable to anybody withing the first 5 minutes of using the device. To make matters worse, the way mouse inputs are handled is similarly bad. Unusable and unpredictable acceleration curve with no exposed configuration to tune it, and decades of trying everything possible to avoid having a second button has created all kinds of nonstandard ways of handling right mouse clicks and all kinds of legacy keyboard gyrations for simple actions that could just be handled through a right-click context menu. Option-Shift-Command-Delete really, so I'm modifying a modification or a modifier key? Wow, that's totally discoverable. The semantics of such a command astound. (it's slowly improving, but right-click context menus are not really in the Apple culture).
It's bizarre because Apple is really the first company to design their devices around non-keyboard input, even going to far as to remove arrow keys off of the keyboard in early devices to force people to use the mouse, their touch devices have reinvented mobile computing, and their interface standards are extremely high, why is it then that the mouse I had with my original single body black and white Macintosh is more usable than anything the company has produced since the ridiculous hockey puck mouse in the 90s? Does nobody in the company actually use their products? Is everybody just walking around with MBPs using the trackpads?
One lesson to be learned though is that there simply is a certain amount of complexity you have to deal with in modern computing. You can shift that complexity around (eliminate the right mouse button, but then you have to have awkward and non-discoverable four key combinations), but it's very hard to eliminate it. Trying to find the optimal balance point that allows the best possible management of this complexity is hard.
Using synergy and an external Linux PC to drive the mouse solves the problem. But I like the Mac touchpads so much that the mouse problem sort of disappears, especially now with the new external touchpad. Now, I find even using a mouse (or touchpad) on other Windows / Linux computers is slightly annoying.
Completely non-discoverable, some of the worst physical input design I've seen since the Nintendo Virtual Boy. I really don't understand it either, I don't remember having nearly this consternation pre-OSX
The touch-pads are extremely nice though. I have used Mac's since 2001 beginning with an iBook and since then find it difficult to use a mousing surface on other manufacturers laptops. It just doesn't have the same smooth feel, there is more resistance or it doesn't correctly pick up on my motions, the surface Apple uses to cover their touch pads is something special and different.
defaults write .GlobalPreferences com.apple.mouse.scaling -1
I'm not sure if this command will help with that.
But in any case, I'm sold on the trackpad now, and I'm not going back. :)
I wouldn't be surprised. My hatred of Apple mice is about equal to my love of their trackpads :)
I actually dislike the trackpad for precision work, but do like it for broad gestures like scrolling.
Now, that's not just the hardware--- OS X's single-button usability makes a huge impact here. When I have to boot Windows for SolidWorks or Matlab (or pretty much anything else), it's basically unusable without also plugging in a mouse.
> The most innovative mouse in recent history - the top is a touchpad. The problem is it is difficult to hold the mouse and perform the two finger scrolling necessary. Clicking doesn't give you the feedback you would like and again there really is only 2 buttons available (left and right). It is difficult to use a touchpad on a device intended to slide around your table, and tough to click a mouse on a touchpad.
You don't need two fingers to scroll. One is sufficient. Clicking is an audible and you can very well feel it with your finger. It's not a touchpad nor is it intended to be used as a touchpad. It's just that instead of scrolling using a tiny nudge on the top you can use way more surface (anywhere in the top 2/3 of the mouse) to scroll in any direction you want.
The number of revisions on mice that Apple has produced that actually are multi-button mouse, obfuscated under a pseudo-one-button form factor is simply mind-boggling. Just put a second stupid button on the darn thing. I used to do a lot of work with some pre-press design bureaus that were all mac shops. Without fail, every single one of their Macs had either a logitech mouse or a microsoft mouse hooked up to them. When I asked them about it they just said that whenever they bought a new machine they just tossed out whatever Apple had packaged and replaced it with one of those two mice vendors as company policy.
I was referring to the advanced gestures which is not a fair comparison to simple scrolling. But even simple one finger scrolling I struggled with - it could just be my hands in particular.
The entire frame clicking that they have had on various mice including the Magic Mouse just doesn't have the same clicky-ness as an average Logitech or Microsoft mouse.
It is marketed by a touchpad - they refer to it as a multi touch device "The world’s first Multi-Touch mouse". That is the same thing they call their touchpad - "The largest Multi-Touch trackpad ever."
Combine the Magic Mouse with Better Touch Tool (http://blog.boastr.net/) and you have yourself one killer mouse. I wouldn't give it up for any mouse in the world.
BTW, including a picture of an iMac's mouse plugged into a Macbook into this post was also misleading - the cord is intentionally short because it was intended to plug into the iMac's keyboard, not be an all-purpose peripheral.
The image had been passed around earlier this week - I clearly state it is "An unfair image because the mouse is made to be used with a keyboard with a usb port on the left and right side, but a valid point."
Valid because a mouse should be portable to any computer, especially made from the same company.
The biggest improvement is in scrolling. Momentum scrolling is addictive and useful.
When Microsoft first released their first optical mouse (was it the very first optical mouse? I don't know, but it was the first one I knew of. This was about '98 or so) I eagerly paid the $80 for the behemoth (the thing was huge). Not having to deal with an Apple mouse getting clogged all the time alone made this mouse worth it, nevermind actually having more than one button.
People always point out the magic mouse. I hate it just as much as any other Apple mouse. I have a magic mouse about 2 feet from me as I type this. It seems like Apple can never get everything right. The Magic Mouse is fine on the top side of it, but the bottom has so much friction that moving it around on the desk is a stuttery, frustrating chore.
Interestingly, I've always found Microsoft makes the best mice. My current favorite is the Arc, which is meant to be a travel mouse, yet I use it as my daily mouse. The whole "Apple can do everything right except mice" and "Microsoft often gets things wrong, except their mice" thing has always boggled my mind :)
Yes, it looks weird next to the rest of my Apple gear, especially since it is this silver black, but overall it is way better than any mouse Apple has ever released.
That said, regarding the geek fascination with multi-button mics - IMO Apple got it right with one-button (and pseudo-one button like the Magic Mouse & Might Mouse) mice. Yes, you guys/gals can handle multi-button mice. I can handle multi-button mice. But I've witnessed far too many people (even today!) who have a hard time distinguishing between right/lift clicking. Add to that the propensity of many Windows-software authors to provide options that can only be accessed via right-click (some Mac software does this also, but IME much less than Windows software) and you have a recipe for confusion.
Provide one-button mics for everyone and allow advanced users to upgrade to multi-button mice (which is what the Magic/Mighty mice do without having to buy additional hardware) is a good compromise IMO.
Into the trash it goes...
At this point I'm not going to waste the time to figure it out.
http://store.razerzone.com/store/razerusa/en_GB/DisplayCateg...
Don't let the lights put you off (in the rollerball and under the hand), you can turn them off.
What I love about that mouse... feel, sensitivity, drivers for mac as well as windows, instant-change sensitivity, tactile feedback is lovely, buttons where you expect there to be buttons (but no more... there aren't buttons all over the thing).
In both cases it's a moot point; the name, yeah I can laugh at it and make fun of it, but really it makes no difference in the usability of the product; and the battery life issue, while annoying, is easily managed by having 2 sets of rechargeable batteries - pretty much a requirement with any wireless mouse.
Other than those two fairly insignificant issues, this is a great mouse and I can't imagine using anything else right now.
However, this was only the case after I applied the software update for my aluminum bluetooth keyboard. The first few weeks with the mouse would get me only a few days worth of use, at best.
Maybe there's another bluetooth device nearby that's causing your Magic Mouse to work too hard, and suck up too much juice?
(Note: I don't use my Magic Mouse anymore because I've since fallen in love with the Magic Trackpad, which has survived even the most precise work with Photoshop for mocking up pixel-accurate UIs.)
I'm also comparing it to my old bluetooth mouse (a small laptop mouse by MS), and I only changed the AAA's in that maybe twice a year. Seems odd to me that a device running 2 AA's would need replacing twice as often.
I use a Microsoft bluetooth mouse (the best bluetooth mouse I have ever found) and the batteries last about a few months with heavy daily use. It takes 2 AAA batteries.
Luckily the magic trackpad is now my input device of choice, but I spent a to much time cleaning the small ball of my mighty mouse (without opening it): [http://www.brendanfenn.com/cleanmouse.html]
And then again, if I have to use a three button mouse I've to choose a better mouse, something like a Logitec or, argh, Microsoft mouse. Both of them are cheaper and better than any Apple one.
I wish I could get a "magic" logitech (thumb) trackball. I saw yesterday that Logitech are releasing a new version of the trackman wheel which I bought 7yrs ago and now use with my iMac. Unfortuntely, it looks like the only difference is a blue ball instead of a red one
That being said , I'm not sure if the author has used a Magic Mouse or not, but I love mine. Sure it doesn't have a million buttons or anything, but in my experience it works great for things I do at my computer(Write Software, surf the internet).
The worst part of that mouse, though, is that it requires a special USB transmitter. Originally it was quite long, but subsequent versions have reduced the size. No matter, though, because the range is still terrible on the RF transmission. If you have a big, roomy desk (or keep the transmitter on a KVM off to the side), then you're going to frequently run into the mouse pointer freezing as the mouse and transmitter re-establish a correction. Unless it has line of sight, it will happen. I found it maddening, and had to stop using the device.
Oh, it's also obvious that he never used a 2009-style Apple “Magic” Mouse. It does click, it is way better than the Mighty when it comes to detecting a right click, and the scroll and expose gestures are fantastic. I wish he had never covered it rather than blatantly and transparently lie to us like this.
I've actually had all the mice listed in the article and I still keep coming back to my MX Revolution. The problem is that none of them are two-button mice that I can rest my hand on. The older mice simply did not support right-click functionality, and the newer mice require that your left finder can't be on the mouse while performing a right-click.
Personally i find the forward and back buttons on a mouse to be highly irritating, whenever i use a mouse with them i always accidentally press them.
If you map them to something else (say... modifier keys), you can do all sorts of useful things. Like hold down one of the buttons and click on files to select more than one. Or activate Spaces if you click the middle button, but activate Expose if you click the middle button while holding the back button down.
If back/forward buttons had to stay back/forward buttons I'd agree that they are pointless. They don't though; they can be super useful.
Since getting this thing it's been great. Once you install better mouse or magic menus the versatility really takes off. Forget 1,2, or even 10 button mice. I have configured 12 different gestures I could do more but they get hard to remember. While the hump could be higher the weight is perfect, and it feels solid.
Due to so many comments in this discussion I'm even contemplating getting the touchpad now.
To call Apple mice lousy is to completely miss the point. I really like the basic set of hardware buttons that an Android handset requires for navigation, but my mum can never remember which one does what. The iPhone has one button that does one thing.
The average user is not like us. Our biggest failing as developers and designers is when we forget that.
The Mighty Mouse is likewise an unreliable piece of garbage, yet with no way of fixing its primary, and easily noticeable problem, the clogged ball. It's like the purpose for the entire transition from balled mice to optical mice was never a lesson Apple learned. And again, this is noticeable within a very short time-frame under use-testing. And this was a $50 piece of hardware!