The reason is that they charge me less when I'm also willing to be a TV 'subscriber'. TV+Internet is cheaper than Internet alone. The cable box just sits in its cardboard box in the attic, I still use my antenna because the quality is better.
The reason is that they charge me less when I'm also willing to be a TV 'subscriber'. TV+Internet is cheaper than Internet alone. The cable box just sits in its cardboard box in the attic, I still use my antenna because the quality is better.
Not true. Check your bill. TV+Internet might be cheaper when only counting the base rate of TV, but when you get TV you also get tons of fees piled on. FCC fees, Local Cable Access fees, Franchise fees, Cable Box fees, Taxes, etc. It will be different depending on where you live, but when I added up all the fees it added almost $15 extra per month just for basic cable.
It's still cheaper to just pay extra for internet without cable TV and get an OTA antenna.
The option to just outright buy internet doesn't exist in their plans. Didn't give me any other options.
Theifs. Liers. Con artists.
I'm so fucking done with Comcast I'm building up a blueprint to help my town get community owned fiber access.
Everything I keep running into says don't. It doesn't work. It costs to much.
I hope it costs to much. I want Comcast to burn in hell for eternity.
Google fiber is in town so prices are ok for data. I set out to get 10 mbits/sec service, the least I could buy was 50 mbits for $35. Apparently I'm getting 75 mbits now.
Only until 2017 did I actually start receiving the advertised speed.
Every year when my contract is about to expire they tell me my rates will be increasing from $60 to $90/mo., I call in and say I want to cancel and go to CenturyLink unless there is a comparable retention offer, and they continuously offer me a similar rate if I sign a new contract. It takes about 5 minutes, though I wish I didn't have to jump through hoops.
In a competitive market, they will do this for me within 2 calls usually with no escalations.
My friends in places where there is no other option go all the way up the chain with no results, since their threat to leave has no teeth.
It was crazy observing the difference in customer service when I moved to a major metro.
What I'm trying to say is that I agree that they suck, but they do subsidize the cities with higher fees in the country, and also that haggling is important.
That may be true, but cities also cost less to serve than rural areas. Less density means that equipment serves fewer customers, each customer requires more cable to serve, technicians need to travel further between calls (or you need more of them), etc.
However, in Redwood City, CA, here is what my bill shows for additional fees:
Broadcast TV Fee: $7.00
FCC Regulatory Fee: $0.08
Franchise Fee: $2.03
PEG Access Support: $0.55
Local Utility User Tax: $1.49
State Sales Tax: $0.23
So, $13.10 in fees vs ?? in fees and ?? in additional costs to have Internet without Cable TV.
> Not true.
It can be. I had Internet-only service with Comcast for $65-ish/month. One day they called me up and offered TV+Internet for $55-ish/month, plus 12 months at a rate lower than that. I thought it was a scam at first, but I tried it. It was in fact a legit offer.
Its now in my closet still in the box.
It doesn't cost much more than subscribing to an online TV service and has a pretty good selection at the basic channel tier.