I have no idea whether or not this is cost effective given current mining difficulties and cloud hosting rates... but I'm sure someone somewhere is doing this.
I have no idea whether or not this is cost effective given current mining difficulties and cloud hosting rates... but I'm sure someone somewhere is doing this.
[0] But I wouldn't say the article describes money laundering. The proceeds from the scheme are not (and don't try to look) "clean" at all.
Look, I'm not a criminal mastermind so I have not run the numbers to decide whether or not this is a good use of your resources. I'm just saying that cryptocurrencies might be appealing to people wanting to steal money and that KYC isn't going to save you.
There is no need to money launder money you have mined yourself.
If you can already spend it on miners and utilities, why go through the pain of cryptocurrency? Just buy jet skis and restaurants or whatever it is you actually want.
Two things. First: if there was an inactive area of the brain that did not contribute to your behavior, it is very likely evolution would have entirely disabled it. The brain is the single most energy expensive organ in the body. Second, and more importantly: your consciousness does not control your behavior anyways - the only thing that is reasonably known to be in its power is the ability to stop yourself from doing things. Consciousness sees an after-action report of the decisions that the rest of your brain makes, and hence concludes that "it" is responsible for them. (This can be seen by your brain deciding on a course of action seconds before you become consciously aware of it.) As such, the experience of an inert consciousness would probably not be all that different from your active one. Maybe it would have to justify a few more impulsive actions in hindsight.
You may be modelling this as a separate being who is confused and terrified, but that's a category mistake - sensations and feelings happen to your consciousness, not in your consciousness.