Future Searching
dilbert.com
dilbert.com
There will always be more significant barriers to embracing capitalism. Many people are comfortable with the existence of a welfare state and will never be capitalists no matter how easy it is to acquire resources and minimize risk. There is unprecedented opportunity today succeed in the game of capitalism, either as an entrepreneur or a skilled worker, but there is an obvious lack of initiative among large segments of the world's population. I doubt this situation will change no matter how low the barriers to entry are.
There's a reason he has to emphasize legal, and that's because the obvious cash crop isn't. The market of capitalism has decided, and has found the best use of the land possible.
> Suppose you want to find a turnkey web site management company...
A listing site of vetted companies providing X service, unbribe-able by ad-dollars, would have to be subscription-only to be sustainable. Unfortunately charging for online content doesn't have the best history. Facebook and LinkedIn are positioning themselves to find said company 'close' to you that people can recommend.
> Think of it as Match.com for startups.
This one has gone around a couple of times here before, and ranges from an actual web app, to that google spreadsheet that comes up every once in a while. So, the need's definitely there. Arguably, meetup.com meets that need rather successfully.
What makes the "obvious cash crop" so profitable is the fact that it's illegal, and therefore requires a high premium to cover the risk involved. There's nothing inherently super-profitable about growing pot.
Don't some people (many?) people put up a site with a 'buy now' button and count the number of clicks and gather email addresses to validate their concept before spending time coding up the solution? Or post the idea to HN? It seems possible to do some of what's being described already.
Cash crops profits [ordered desc] = {P(C1), P(C2), P(C3)}.
Legal cash crops = {C2, C3}.
Successfully plantable by inexperienced farmer = {C1}.
... without C1 the expert system refuses to continue further :)