Hacker News Reader

Comment by yani | Hacker News Reader

Car registrations are required. You are allowed a choice of owning a vehicle knowing what it requires. Sample of your DNA and fingerprints is not a requirement when we are born. Thus I find the comparison not adequate.

View on HN

You're not required to use the page. It's no real difference if your uncle has a white van or a matching DNA in a database.

With GDPR, you should be able to force 23andme to delete your DNA information after you received the results. That's if you're European at least.

But it wasn’t the suspect’s DNA it was his relative’s. Deleting your own information would not be a sufficient privacy measure in this case. It’s increasingly statistically likely that someone you’re a relative of will be in a DNA database, it’s simply not tractable to ask all of them to remove their DNA. And what about when some of these people die, can I take down my late grandma’s DNA.

If I am European and I ask Facebook to remove my data, will they also remove pictures of me which are owned by my family? I doubt it, and that's also the problem with providing consent on these DNA databases - they don't require the consent of all of your relatives.

So to tune the analogy: "A white van was found at the scene. Police have reason to believe the van's owner wasn't driving that day and investigate the owner's son, who is also known to sometimes use that van. That investigation reveals much stronger evidence that the son is the perpetrator."

I see no issues with this chain of investigation. Some tools the police have access to you cannot personally opt out of. That's working as intended.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com