Corporate America Is Conspiring to Keep Your Chocolate Shitty
splinternews.com
splinternews.com
By the way, the connection between Hershey's and Cadbury goes way back to the founding days. There's a fascinating book called "Chocolate Wars" by Deborah Cadbury that chronicles that time.
If you have to go through a supply chain, you value stability and not melting more than you value taste.
A lot of people don't like it. A lot of people do.
It tasted like a chocolate-covered cracker. Nothing wrong with that, but chocolate covered crackers are a crowded space in the confections market and without the "malted milk" taste, which I suppose must come from the butyric acid, I found the non-US KitKat to be a completely uninspired contender. That taste is the thing that makes KitKat bars unique and exciting to me.
To each their own, but I hope the one-sided nature of the media frenzy (US BAD! FOREIGN GOOD!) doesn't end in the mediocritization of a wonderful candy bar.
In distressing disbelief, I glanced at the URL looking for theonion.com, before collecting myself.
This is a photo of the chocolate aisle in an average Parisian supermarket:
It was sent to me the other day as a cheeky taunt, by my brother who lives there and asked if I needed anything. Of course I do.
You can see here at least 7 different varieties of exquisite, melting praline chocolate. Fine, pure darks of varying strength. The usual pistachio, roasted almond, rice, hazelnut, vanilla, mint, and the more creative (and let's face it : less authentic) pear, apricot, citrus, macaron, crème brûlée (!), raspberry, blueberry, even grapefruit !
I'll never forget the shock when I first moved to the UK, browsing through the aisles and naively looking for my standard French/Belgian/Swiss fare of dark chocolate with roasted almonds, hazelnut, or rice.
I found nothing of the sort, instead on offer was potentially very fine chocolate laced with Wasabi, of all things ! Wasabi, I repeated in horror, taking a snapshot to immediately report the outrage back home. And chilli, yes of course chilli : the ubiquitous alibi in British cuisine, akin to gratuitous violence in action movies. The favourite lazy fix of bland meals that otherwise wouldn't stand on their own feet. A smokescreen of burnt tastebuds to hide behind. A pain that I'm aware (but still to this day can't understand why) many people enjoy inflicting unto themselves.
I suppose this sinking feeling of mixed embarrassment, pity and smug sympathy I had reading the article, must be similar to the one British or American expats in France experience the first time they tune into the radio and hear the French try, and fail hard, at rock'n'roll or hip-hop.
To each their strengths. The Swiss and Belgians are the unrivalled masters of chocolate, and the French at least worthy connoisseurs of the art.
Now, I can't even begin to imagine how American chocolate tastes, having just witnessed someone actually put British Cadbury's at the apex of cocoa achievement.
You can still have your American Hershey bar, it's just not chocolate, it's candy. It's too bad the Swiss or whoever didn't secure "chocolate" like France did for champagne.
He came back to the states and started ordering beans from the farms he helped start and making bean to bar chocolate here.
The point is that big factory Chocolate is a different thing entirely. Cadbury, Hershey's, it is all shit.
* High fructose corn syrup glycemic index 100 vs normal sugar glycemic index 70. The higher the glycemic index the sweeter the product tastes. High fructose corn sugar is a biproduct from subsidized corn production. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fructose
* Palm oil(Cancergenic) https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/160503-0. Palm oil is cheap so manufacturers use it everywhere but it is cancergenic.
The next time you are in the supermaket, twist the label and read the contents. You will be surprised how hard its to find good products. When I surved the local online super market store only about 3 candys out of 100 had ok content ie not High fructose corn syrup or Palm oil.
This is just plain false. Fructose has a glycemic index of 25 (1/4 that of glucose), hence HFCS-55 (55% fructose, 45% glucose) has a lower glycemic index at 58 than "normal sugar" (which is 50-50 fructose-glucose) at 65.
> The higher the glycemic index the sweeter the product tastes
Glycemic index has nothing to do with sweetness. Fructose is twice as sweet as glucose with a quarter of the glycemic index; aspartame is 200x as sweet with basically 0 GI.
Candy or chocolate made with sucrose rather than corn syrup tastes different (and I would agree, better), but don't delude yourself that it is in any way better for your health.
People might have different tastes.
Hershey's lawsuit against Cadbury was due to intellectual property rights being violated.
Please stop this communist nonsense.
Even at walmart you can get a ghirardelli dark, or a lindt 90%. Cadbury--even UK cadbury--is a chunk of sugared grease by comparison.
Then I left Britain, and didn't eat any for about two years. Then it tasted like sugared grease.
It still seems like an upgrade from Hershey's ;-)
Brought up the dark chocolate because it is the more costly product to manufacture. Cocoa solids and cocoa butter are expensive. Sugar and vegetable oil aren't. If this is a corporate ploy to acclimate people to trash chocolate for profits, she was already on trash chocolate. But even in the low-rent grocers, the premium product is available. Doesn't jive with her thesis.
I wrote that because cadbury has gotten heat in the past for substituting vegetable fats for cocoa butter, and the #2 ingredient in her favorite is sugar. Cocoa products make their first appearance at #3: https://www.cadbury.co.uk/products/cadbury-dairy-milk-11294
Compare with the Lindt 90%: https://www.lindtusa.com/wcsstore/LindtCatalogAssetStore/Att...
From the HN guidelines:
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."