edit:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3728692A/en
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3771138
[1] Should have said simultaneous multithreading (SMT) instead of hyper threading which is specific to Intel.
It would be interesting to know anything more on the AMD/Intel agreements than the vague "x86 cross licensing" though for sure.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2488/000119312509236...
The first will be a quicker read than the second ;). The other commenter mentioned SMT was an IBM patent rather than an Intel one, so that's probably the answer to my question. It seems weird that they wouldn't have just licensed that from IBM as well.
But that SEC link is awesome; I though the agreement was completely confidential and we'd only ever see it in a historical context. Thanks!
https://scalibq.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/the-myth-of-cmt-clu...
I mean, yeah, that's actively happening, as can also be seen by the Intel/Vega combo.