The salty parents would ask why you think it's ok to oppressively surveil everything that your child does, and say that you should be able to leave your child playing a game without risking exposing the child to tobaco, alcohol, ro gambling ads.
Just stop giving your kids money, or pay more attention to their spending habits. If you think attention to your kid is oppressive surveillance, then there is no hope for you. Apparently children are oppressed by their parents' attention and they are suddenly capable of looking after themselves, yet at the same time you are in favor of prohibition of in-game loot crates because children are not capable of looking after themselves, but you also can't look after them because that would be oppressive. The cognitive dissonance is real.
> Apparently children are oppressed by their parents
A discussion can be had without words such as "oppressed".
What's the benefit of X? They're invented by business as a new way of attracting Y. Why shouldn't this be regulated or banned?
Feel free to substitute X and Y by virtually anything.
> A discussion can be had without words such as "oppressed".
Read the comment to what I was replying.