Now I live in NYC, same salary, but finally have my own place that's not shared with others. I live in a 30th floor studio apartment in Manhattan, take the subway to work, and pay less rent than my friends in the Bay Area who live in 1-bed apartments.
Average rent in SF - $3,558
I don't know your situation but NYC is basically in the same boat (just with a better rail system).
For a more precise comparison, see: https://www.expatistan.com/cost-of-living/comparison/new-yor...
As of this writing, rent for a one bedroom apartment is 30% more in SF than in NYC.
My rent is $2640. I know people in Pacifica, Palo Alto, and Mountain View paying anywhere from $2700 to $3200 for a 1 bedroom.
So - how much of the "ridiculous" salary is left after subtracting living costs and taxes, actually?
The super commuters tend to be lower paid workers.
While $240,000 is a nice salary it's not even close to what you'd need to afford a house in SV. And that's just housing. All in all it feels like a bad deal.
This cannot be correct. If you are taking home $20,000 a month and cannot have a house in SV the problem is not affordability but availability. Or what kind of house are you talking about.
Glassdoor shows Google software engineers make a base of $127k cash plus $75k bonus and stock:
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Google-Salaries-E9079.htm
Senior software engineers make more, but there seem to be many fewer of them relative to software engineer.
I live a decent life, 2 annual international trips, own a car, lease a ski house with friends in the winter, if you make over 120k, life in the bay area is quite nice.
I assume you must live a VERY spartan life in the Bay. Basically pay your rent (which must be shared or very cheap for the Bay) and utilities and not do much else...
I mean the average Bay area rent is more than the difference between your take home and your savings...
edit: I'm using ADP's calculator, don't know why SmartAsset is different but ADP is pretty legit so I'm going to continue to lean towards those numbers.
https://smartasset.com/taxes/california-tax-calculator#RZ3V1...
Sharing an apartment isn't "spartan", it's "normal"
I was saving much less per month because as a couple we rented our own single bedroom apartment and my SO doesn't work. However, we still managed to save enough in 5 years (while still not having sold most of the vested equity) to buy a house in the Bay Area. So I agree that the pay is worth the hassle, so far at least.
I'm curious how much you spend for food monthly (including restaurants)? Somewhat surprisingly this is the highest cost for us, after rent/mortgage, and we do cook a lot at home (go out maybe twice a month).
It may be "the new normal" in the Bay Area and other hyperstressed markets.
But it's not a living standard most people aspire to.
From my perspective, as the sole income earner of a family of four, that's a pretty shocking statement.
I feel like I've built a very comfortable life for myself and my family, and I make quite a bit less than that.
*Caveat: I'm unmarried and don't have kids. I don't own a house yet. I think that might change the equation a bit.