Sincere questions for Musk would be:
How are you supporting your management team when you've asked their subordinates to bypass them with good ideas for exposure, leaving them only to provide risks and bad news their subordinates didn't want to bring forward?
How do local team leaders take risks when their team is encouraged to defect and draw in the exec at the first sign of controversy, or just opportunistically?
How do your teams commit to shared outcomes when an arbitrary member can call in a veto from the top?
How do you as the owner not become the bottleneck (and blocker) while everyone clambers to have your support their pet issue because they know nothing is going to get traction without your royal assent?
How do managers not just fire people who call in your air support for things they are in fact wrong about, and how do managers trust those people to be a part of the team after?
His company, his rules. But having seen this kind of naive abdication of responsibility for effective delegation in practice, it is reasonable to ask how this thing scales when you add the uncertainty of a random super veto, and encourage and reward transgression.
edit: better link to "The Asshole Filter," article.