Techno-Fundamentalism Can’t Save You, Mark Zuckerberg
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
Seems more than a little out of context to not mention the deep surveillance of FB.
Nonetheless, this article seems to have rather minimal information per paragraph, and I'd also at least appreciate learning the opposite of techno-fundamentalism. Maybe an example of perceived benefits in an area where we haven't been 'techno-fundamentalists'? Overall, not impressed.
End-of-life care is one area where the thinking is changing from techno-fundamentalism to something more...human(e)
>"But, more crucial, it’s also an expression of techno-fundamentalism, the unshakable belief that one can and must invent the next technology to fix the problem caused by the last technology. Techno-fundamentalism is what has landed us in this trouble. And it’s the wrong way to get us out."
Platforms like Facebook are just exposing these innate human biases that have existed since the birth of our species.
The congressional hearings showed that even for some really smart people it's hard to understand the annals of technology and the broader dynamics.
In my view Mr. Zuckerberg's points on AI were more about identifying bots, and bad actor campaigns and not focused on censorship of individual ideas.
Wtf?!
I imagine you'd be troubled, and no amount of money can alleviate that kind of troubled feeling, ever.