The degree to which companies on the internet thrive through aggressive doublespeak is frustrating beyond belief.
The degree to which companies on the internet thrive through aggressive doublespeak is frustrating beyond belief.
If however they start curating content or being especially controlling then they risk being classed as a normal publisher, and as such liable to additional regulations or damages based on actions of their users and/partners.
This is why Facebook is in a bind about “fake news” being shared on their network. If they remove it then they will be accused of not being an impartial platform. So instead, at best, they have to algorithmically cross reference posts with other reliable content sources to “flag” to the user that the shared article “may” be inaccurate. Unless that post contains a bit of naked flesh, it ain’t being taken down.