How North Korea’s Hackers Became Dangerously Good
wsj.com
wsj.com
That's about the facts of this story.
> "Many North Korean hackers are using perfect English or embedding other languages into coding to make it appear hacks came from other countries, the researchers have concluded"
Everyone ends up using English even in comments. It's just easier. Everyone knows it. And it's where most resources are.
Obviously comments don't need to be in MLA form, ya know?
Is that in common usage ? I have never seen it used to designate a group of people.
I believe so.
I picked up this usage (ESL as a descriptor of person) from forums and boards around the internet. Not sure how correct it is.
It was a very strange feeling. Whoever had renamed it was replying to the subject of the bookmark folder. So Eg. If the folder was called "Fast cars", then it would have been relabelled something like "I, this is fast cars pal." Both the "I" at the start and the "pal" are typically Scottish, which is where I'm from.
I deleted the folder.
This reminds me of something similar that I experienced.
When I was younger my mother and I started noticing food missing in that there would be less of a bag of chips than we recalled. Nothing was ever completely eaten and the food had to have been opened first. We were pretty sure something weird was happening, and then one day we got home and I noticed there was a can of pop missing. I was absolutely certain I knew how many were left, so at this point we were convinced someone other than ourselves was responsible. After talking to other residents in the townhouse complex we find out we're not the only ones that this is happening to.
Fast forward a few days and I'm locked out of our townhouse. I went to my friend, who lived a few townhouses down, and asked if I could hang out for a bit as I was locked out. He proceeds to tell me that the caretaker's daughter who lives in one of the townhouses has a master key and can let me in, as she did it for him before.
We walk over to her place and he asks her to let me in with her master key. I will never forget the mix of anger and fear in her face as she weakly tries to deny having the key, only for him to bring up past incidents she has let him in. She relents and walks us over to my townhouse and lets me inside.
Amazingly, after that day we no longer had food and pop go missing.
TLDR: carbon monoxide is a helluva drug
The most likely explanation is that you did it and have no memory of it; this can be caused by taking certain sleep medications, having a sleep disorder, or by other environmental conditions (like a CO leak, already mentioned).
The next most likely is that a friend or family member with a bizarre sense of humor is playing a prank on you.
It is more likely that you own a cat, who is literate and can operate a computer, than that your system was remotely compromised for the purposes of renaming your bookmarks.
However, the folder in particular was a collections of links, one of which I suspected had a virus. So I named it "folder with possible virus links". I can only imagine whoever was in my computer, could not resist renaming this.
I have no medication, no negative environmental conditions and I am, by normal standards, a sane individual.
I wish. I inherited a project full of third-party libraries that were commented in Cyrillic (I assume Russian).
Also, I imagine that those skills allow you to talk to the outside world without any old people knowing whats going on.
Most Stasi snitches (IMs) didn't need much 'encouragement' by the Stasi, most did it for purely egoistical reasons (money or favours).
as reported in doubtful articles and by sources with reasons to put some spice on their stories (e.g. to have them celebrated and promoted as heroic defectors as opposed to run of the mill immigrants).
https://www.fullwsj.com/articles/how-north-koreas-hackers-be...
javascript:location.href='http://facebook.com/l.php?u='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)Yikes!! I understand mistakes happen, but what an absolute betrayal of trust
What has become of this paper?
Remember, this error probably will get people killed.
A rapid & public sacking may not reverse the error, but will have at least some preventative effect -- some people learn from the mistakes of others.
Of course this should not be the only step, and they should also add processes & procedures to help make it more difficult for this error to get through again (default to no names for sources?, second set of eyes asking for every source?)
When the likely result is to get someone killed, there should be serious consequences for the people, regardless of whether it was 'people' or 'process' that you put at the top of the fault chain.
That is the way it works in the real world. Small bits of inattention can lead to death. We don't say that 'it was just a small thing' when someone is texting while driving and crashes and injures/kills people, even tho it was just a a few seconds lapse of attention.
This source, and/or his family back home are now likely on a NK hit list. The employer has now had it's credibility for confidentiality destroyed for a decade. This lapse should have consequences.
(And if you don't like the potential consequences, either make sure you play the game right, or don't play the game.)
When mistakes of a certain threshold happen, the organization should have a post-mortem to ensure such a scenario does not recur.
In addition, the person who failed should hold their own post-mortem in private, with the possible addition of a supervisor to determine how they failed, if at all, and how they can use the incident as a learning experience.
"Blame process, not people" is great in that it encourages folks not to pillory someone for a mistake that they themselves could have possibly made, but it is not a "Get out of jail free" card.
This really subtly shows one of the darkest sides of journalism, especially considering it's coming from the WSJ. The engagement of the audience and ad revenue is so important that protecting sources and journalistic integrity is so easily forgotten by the author and editors.
He was a French pulp spy novels writer (SAS), who turned out to be some kind of mailbox between intelligence services to share spy stories. So a lot of his books are directly inspired from real stories, with names changed. Until he forgot to change the name of a CIA station chief...
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/magazine/gerard-de-villie...
It's much more likely they just hire technical mercenaries.