Another Scam ICO? Savedroid Founder Exits with $50M to Chill on a Beach
cryptovest.com
cryptovest.com
To be honest I think he started out honestly with his true mission, not trying to scam anyone, but when he saw all that money in his bank account he probably thought “I guess I made it?” And decided to drop the whole thing.
The thing about people like him is, they are usually extremely careless and will eventually lose all that money without too much effort, either he will spend carelessly in gambling, or get caught by the feds, or burn it in some other way.
It’s usually always the same story. It doesn’t last. I studied someone who won a lot of money from a gambling business, to people who inherited a lot of money from family, to people who get money from investors without putting in much effort. They all usually end in the same way, they lose it all, and it’s usually because of bad management of wealth.
My hypothesis is that when they get money the shortcut way what they don’t get is the management skill that is required for having a lot of wealth. Money is fascinating, in what it does to the mind of the holder. How money reaches the holder, usually determines how long it lasts as well.
I’m studying a few more group of people, my hypothesis has not been wrong yet. People who work hard for their money tend to be able to make less go much further. They seem to be much more efficient, and are usually very good at turning 100 into 1000.
or they were always douchebags but had to pretend they weren't when they didn't have fuck you money.
I’d like to think that there is truth in that.
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Whittaker_(lottery_winner...
1: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/24vzgl/you_just_...
edit to add: that second link claims that "Nearly one third of multi-million dollar jackpot winners eventually declare bankruptcy" but does not include a source.
1. there are exceptions to many rules.
2. how did Whittaker mismanage his winnings? A series of misfortunes does not tell us anything about his ability to manage his wealth.
> This hypothesis is somewhat contradicted by the experience of Jack Whittaker[0]
You may not have meant it that way, but I can see how your response can be taken that way
At 25 years old my friend took half of his money and he researched which Canadian Aboriginal tribes his grandfather and great-grandfather displaced with their logging industry and he directed his money to supporting their causes. He's just about finished his law degree and rather than use it to make money as a corporate lawyer or high priced attorney he's dedicating his career to helping refugees.
You're not wrong that it can hurt, but I don't think it is as much of a given as you're making it out to be.
... and this sentence becomes more ambiguous
The only good argument is that stealing from people is immoral.
I agree that it's a buyer beware market, but it's because of people like this guy. The laws are on the books and hopefully will be enforced. Just because it's a new tech doesn't mean it's a lawless frontier even though some people are acting like it is.
Unless he wants a life of paranoia, he's limited to countries who don't extradite to the United States [1]. Since his face and name are known, as well as his wealth, he'll likely have to share a good fraction of his proceeds with local officials to stay alive.
[1] https://www.internationalman.com/articles/which-countries-ca...
New Zealand resident, with a service based out of Hong Kong, and the U.S. attempted (still attempting) to extradite him.
And the blatant display ala martin shkreli doesn't play very well once twitter is no longer the buffer between you and reality.
Only the very best scammers ever get to learn about extradition.
Ripping people off for €40 million may end well for this fellow or it might result in a few irritated “investors” (donors?) coming round with knives, or even just fists, for a quick chat about what happened to their money.
It might not be likely but that’s a risk and a much greater one than I would want to take. Besides, someone can only use the defense of polite society if he or she hasn’t already ripped the cover away.
Yeah, there's more than a few cases of people ending up back in the US (or whatever country) in the trunk of a car. I may prefer prison over the constant fear of being "disappeared" by a bounty hunter or hired kidnapper [1-3].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_Sidney_Jaffe
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Luster
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Eichmann#Capture_in_Arge...
As a parallel there are thousands of kids setting out to become the kingpin drug-dealers glamorized in media and most of them end up dead, in jail or working bad dead end low level dealer jobs where they make less than minimum wage.
There are now over fifteen hundred different alt coins most of them languishing in complete obscurity and failure. Nobody knows the exact statistics, but I am sure the vast majority of the reported ICOs were failures too. The ICO market is unregulated so that it does not show when the promoters are buying their own tokens ... I guarantee you that most ICOs were basically propped up by the promoters in order to make them look successful so that they did not really make anyone any money.
The major difference between this and the drug dealers, is that the police have not moved in yet, so people are not going to jail yet.
So it is always better to work in creating real value and making an honest living. And don't worry about what would have been if you were a successful criminal. Consider the infinitely more likely possibility of what would have been if you were failed criminal, or just an impoverished barely-getting-by criminal.
You could probably just go to whatever beach he's chilling at, and just take what you want if you have the physical power to influence him to do so.
A number of people "score" their life by the size of their bank balance. That is easy to do because hey a number is a number and they are easy to compare. As a life score however it doesn't reflect a lot of meaning.
One of the things I point out to young people who are just getting started in their careers is that nobody made the baseball of hall of fame by being the highest paid player. The things they did that counted were runs, and pitches, and defensive plays. Games played, and games won. Owners and managers throw around money to try to put together a team that can win the pennant or the series, but the players are evaluated, and judged, on their play not their pay.
So why would anyone evaluate themselves based on how much they have earned rather than a much more meaningful example like how much they have done. Start evaluating yourself on how many problems you have solved, or how many people you have helped, or how many lives you have saved. Those are good measures for a score. Money isn't.
In reality though there is a psychological effect that benefits those who make a lot of money as long as other people know they make a lot of money. How much money someone is willing to pay you is inherently a value judgement on their part.
All else equal, is a player paid $100K a year or a player paid $10M a year more likely to make the baseball hall of fame?
Wow, so it is [1].
While you're trying to rationalize this, you have been scammed. I hope it wasn't for a lot of money but that money probably isn't coming back.
After getting lost in replies found this article of a guy visiting their office today and finding it devoid of any CPUs and founder missed an event yesterday:
https://hallofrankfurt.de/savedroid-rekt-or-pr-stunt-a60d19e...
Seems so blatant as to be unbelievable!
Posting a selfie and meme is a recipe for arrest, so to me the brazenness of the founder is a vote towards this being a very insensitive "April fools style" marketing strategy. Time will tell, but they certainly made the top of HN if that was their goal.
He didn't post a picture of himself with the beer.
He posted a picture of a hand holding a beer that could be anybody and could easily have been lifted from a random FB account.
What could the possible endgame be? Maybe I lack imagination, but I can't even fathom why anyone would think this is a PR stunt.
As someone that knows both @YassinHankir and @airbone42 personally, while being very skeptical about @savedroidAG , the stories of an Exit Scam just don't add up.
#1 The XX Millions is hard to actually get ahold off, its not all in cryptos that are hard to track, a lot of it is in the normal banking system.
#2 All of their communication up until this point indicated growth plans for their company. I've even had personal communication with @airbone42 roughly a week ago that indicated that.
#3 There is simply no response from anyone associated with the #savedroidico , for an exit scam atleast a few disgruntled employees would have spoken up by now.
#4 From all the people I've talked to in the Frankfurt FinTech Scene, it's like the company simply vanished. You can't do this that cleanly with that many people involved and have anyone have a good outcome even if they had access to all the capital.
#5 Without wanting to speculate, but I want to atleast put the idea out there: What if this is a case of extortion or (let's pray its not) kidnapping? If find it plausible that we're witnessing the authorities handling the situation with the involved people.
#6 The whole PR Coup Scenario is a daft idea. They DON'T need more attention right now. Their product isn't ready yet, from my armchair, they have atleast half a year of development ahead of them before they can deliver anything. Why attention now?
Do we know this? (Also, nothing prevents big wires to Belize.)
> All of their communication up until this point indicated growth plans
Scammers lie.
> for an exit scam atleast [sic] a few disgruntled employees would have spoken up by now
Not necessarily. After Madoff, employees went dark while they talked to lawyers.
> You can't do this that cleanly with that many people involved
Pre-SEC America was rife with elaborate investment scams [1].
> What if this is a case of...kidnapping
What if it's the Illuminati? Occam's razor.
> Without wanting to speculate, but I want to atleast [sic0 put the idea out there
This is a bad disclaimer.
...
If you lost money in this, I'm sorry. Contact your local precinct and make a police report and then file a complaint with (a) the SEC and (b) your state securities regulator. (If you're in the U.S.)
[1] http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/history/usafraud.h...
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. If you lost money to securities fraud, speak to a lawyer.
I might be completely wrong about all of this, but the scenarios discussed just make less sense when I put all that I know together.
The more interesting case is what would happen if instead, he'd just quietly take his money and go his merry way. It seems to me that it could be quite difficult to charge an ICO founder with a crime:
- ICOs do not sell equity in the underlying company.
- ICOs are not debt in the underlying company.
- An ICO buyer acquires neither a stake in the company, nor a right to interest payments. They acquire a bunch of tradeable integers. As long as they got their integers, and the trading platform still works (which in my limited understanding is not hard to do for Ethereum based coins), what cause of action does a buyer have against the company?
Even in cases where there IS a traditional debt or equity relationship, large white collar crimes are often hard to prove. ICO related scams might be all but impossible to prosecute if the principals refrain from spiking the ball, unlike this founder.
[1] - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8d8hz2/was_...
And if it's China that's after you, they'll plainly kidnap you and return to you to China. Russia will just kill you.
No state actor is going to put out a hit on this guy, he's not worth it.
Bahamas, Cuba, Grenada, Haiti, Dominica, Jamaica, Trinidad, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Saint Kitts, France, Netherlands, UK
Cuba is the best shot there, despite there being an existing treaty. And they may turn you over for the right price (with the Castros gone, it's very likely Cuba is about to be more open for business).
The classic case, billionaire banker Allen Stanford:
"From king of the Caribbean to penniless in prison"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/sir-allen-...
US extradition treaties:
"U.S. authorities want to extradite from the Turks and Caicos Islands a Jamaican banker accused of running a Ponzi scheme that bilked investors out of nearly $300 million"
https://in.reuters.com/article/us-caribbean-ponzi/u-s-seeks-...
Or for a lottery scam:
"Eight Jamaicans, including a former police officer were last week extradited to the United States to face charges related to their alleged involvement in a lottery scam."
https://www.caribbeanlifenews.com/stories/2017/5/2017-05-12-...
"Prosecutors in several cities across the United States (US) are getting ready to unleash a wave of up to 500 [!] extradition requests for Jamaicans they believe are involved in the deadly lottery scam."
https://www.stlucianewsonline.com/caribbean-us-prepares-to-r...
They'll extradite you for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of property:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colton_Harris_Moore
Or if you're a Medicaid fraud commiting dentist, they'll also pull you out of the Caribbean:
[2017] "Detroit dentist charged in Medicaid fraud scheme arrested in Caribbean"
https://www.wxyz.com/news/detroit-dentist-charged-in-medicai...
They'll also pull you out of the Caribbean for an alleged murder from 14 years ago:
http://triblive.com/local/allegheny/13339613-74/suspect-arre...
But you don't think they'll go after you for $50m in fraud? It's very obvious they will.
These are unregulated securities aren't they?
It would be no different than me selling you Monopoly money.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't see what law was broken. Not defending this, just saying this is why we have regulations.
In the United States, sentences for $50 million worth of wire fraud can easily run over 10 years.
I can't imagine growing old and never having remorse for a scam like this.
If he:
(1) Is caught; and
(2) Has not spent/lost it already.
Carrying the burden of those risks? Us, the public.
Pardon me, I did not mean to imply we shouldn't go after him. We should. Just wanted to remind us that these scams cost the general public money. Those costs are part of what securities regulations protect us from.
Making the scam in-your-face is a sure way to make people very angry and revengeful. The beach from the photograph can probably be located.
Apparently he's at Movenpick Resort on the Red Sea in El Queseir.
Not sure I'd trust my freedom to the Egyptian government, but my guess is scamming $50M and bragging about it isn't the first mistake he'll make.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5_bwFf_byo
it was a stunt.
Or, he scammed.
Investing a lot of money just into one or only a few ICOs is insane, of course.
This... doesn't seem true.
Ironically, that would be one of the few technically plausible use cases for cryptocurrencies, if you implement it along the lines of Jim Bell's notorious essay "Assassination Politics": http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm
"Launching ICO without escrow? GTFO".
And contracts and laws and regulators and courts?
It doesn't need to be bureaucratic entity. It could be anyone trusted by both sides according to agreement.
Message from the founders: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5_bwFf_byo&feature=youtu.be
What this guy's done, if it's true, is no worse than any other ICO who instead uses their funds to buy a house in the bay area and lease an SF office for a couple years and play ping pong until the cash runs out.
Welcome to 1933 [1], when America learned this about unregistered securities.
Thanks for the lighthearted take on the craziness!
Can somebody confirm that first image (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbDvp9iXkAYaY6s.jpg) hasn't been photo-shopped? Those images don't have any exif data, but it looks like twitter's stripping exif info.
https://cryptobriefing.com/find-yassin-hankir-exit-scam-save...
When you hear people talking about cryptos what you hear them say is exciting things about libertarian currency and being free of control. What they're actually excited about is money laundering and tax avoidance–foolishly at that. Avoiding government control by using a currency where everyone can easily get the entire transaction log for every exchange is just ridiculous. With really great ops-sec you can _maybe_ achieve it, but it's really easy to slip up and get caught.
That's just hilarious.
Make it possible to quickly get fat stacks of cash in any space and watch the space turn to crap.
Also if you're just leaving your Lodrocoin prints around in plain sight that would be the equivalent of leaving your wallet key taped on a post-it to your monitor. An interesting thing you could try with your art but it's also an interesting property of the art that the art is best "displayed" tucked into a drawer somewhere where nobody can see it.
How do we know any of this is real? What if the entire thing is fake?