It is unfortunate that "ECMAScript" is simply a terrible name. I understand why the term is used, but that doesn't make it inherently good, easy to say, or memorable.
Fortunately the ES shorthand is more workable (e.g. ES6, ES2017, etc).
Fortunately the ES shorthand is more workable (e.g. ES6, ES2017, etc).
From the brilliant "A Brief, Incomplete, and Mostly Wrong History of Programming Languages": http://james-iry.blogspot.co.il/2009/05/brief-incomplete-and... .