Hacker News Reader

Comment by ci5er | Hacker News Reader

> ... for long-term community health

I understand words like books and bricks and apples, because these words have physical referents. I have no idea what "long-term community health" means.

What does that mean?

And why would anyone invest more in it than in barricades and highly weaponized security guards? (I'm not actually promoting an armed response to whatever a 'community' is, I'm just using it as a rhetorical foil to try to understand the pros and cons of investing in whatever a 'community' is)

View on HN

A community is a group of people you interact with (and who interact with each other) regularly. Community health means the people are kind to each other, help each other, communicate with each other. If a community is not healthy, they don't talk to each other and view each other as enemies.

If you have barricades and highly weaponized armed guards, you don't have a community. You have a war.

> If you have barricades and highly weaponized armed guards, you don't have a community. You have a war.

Or a highly pacified citizenry? ("Move on citizen. It's after dark. go home.")

What role does Youtube have in making a kumbaya kind of experience?

>Or a highly pacified citizenry?

That's still a war, just a very one-sided war.

>What role does Youtube have in making a kumbaya kind of experience?

I'm assuming the question is "what reason does Youtube have", since their role is pretty clear: they control the platform. If they want people to keep using it, they have to keep those people happy. If they want to prevent a revolt, they have to keep people happy. Because unhappy, unstable people can turn violent. Keeping them happy won't necessarily stop all unstable people from turning violent, but you certainly do maximize that risk when you have some unstable people in your community and your community is already on the brink of a user revolt.

What's the percentage? If 80% o the peasants are revolting, and 80% of the content comes from the unrevolting peasants, do I care?

I'm not advocating that they should or should not care, but if one percent are revolting and 99% comes from the other, don't you think it is time to bring out the uzis?

> What role does Youtube have in making a kumbaya kind of experience?

Why would any corporation want its customers to be happy?

Some businesses certainly don't need to care. A restaurant in central Rome has an infinite supply of new tourists to feed, so they don't need to worry about whether anyone wants to come back. At the other end of the spectrum, a monopolist knows that customers have no choice and must come back regardless of how they're treated.

YouTube has elements of both: there's a near-infinite supply of hopeful Internet video stars, and they also have a near-monopoly on video viewership. They might still want to keep stakeholders happy because these issues tend to brew for a long time until they blow up into public consciousness. (Facebook's promiscuous spreading of user data was known ten years ago, but they only took action now. Damage control would have been easier earlier.)

That is a very short sided perspective. People will ask local tour guides for recommendations, and if they say you suck, you have lost business.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com