Lack of vitamin D possible cause of schizophrenia
thestar.com
thestar.com
The study, published this week in the journal Archives of General Psychiatry, used Denmark’s blood bank, which contains samples from almost every baby born in the country since 1982. It compared the blood of 424 people who developed schizophrenia to an equal number of those who did not.
The lead author, renowned schizophrenia researcher John McGrath, found that babies with a low level of the vitamin during fetal development and infancy had nearly two times the chance of developing the disease.
Given the uncertainty--and the suggestive epidemiological associations--this seems like an excellent subject for a clinical trial. I seem to recall that one is actually occurring (though perhaps for a different disease), but I can't find the link.
And yet, I can guarantee that many people reading this article will immediately take it to heart that "not getting enough sun during pregnancy causes schizophrenia" and make it a part of their personal belief structure. Perhaps the worst effects will be on the mother of schizophrenics, who having just got over the Freudian hangover in which all mental illnesses are blamed on the failings of the parents, will now be able to blame themselves for wearing too much sunscreen during pregnancy.
Thinking about the implications of your comment for my suggestion of a clinical trial, I realized the following: powering a clinical trial to detect any change in the incidence of such a rare disorder is going to require tens or perhaps hundreds of thousands of participants. This sounds absurd but may actually be possible, given how much interest there is in vitamin D lately (faddist, IMHO, but whatever). Possible because (1) social interest; (2) vitamin D is cheap; (3) vitamin D is likely relatively safe at typical doses.
Schizophrenia is actually a common disease, affecting ~1% of the world population, regardless of ethnicity.
It may be no more than a myth that schizophrenia affects all ethnicities equally, according to a review of the data: http://schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/1...
According to a systematic review, it appears that ~0.4% of the world population is affected (lifetime prevalence), not 1%: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1140960/
At any rate, I don't disagree with your general points, I just thought you might be interested in the above refinements.
If the research cited is not in one of the top journals, I'd not even bother reading the abstract.
These journals have the highest impact factor, which is "sort of like PageRank". You could compare this to the IF of the mentioned journal.