>Not sure what is meant
Which is it? :-)
As I interpret it, this article is not a scientific description of a particular physical system, but a metaphor.
That said, it does make sense in the signal domain. Consider electrical and optical resonance. It gets more interesting when the components are complex-valued.
This page is more about constructive interference than it is about resonance. Maybe that's what you are thinking about also?
I see the world as composed of interconnected entities which metaphorically influence and resonate with each other, and there is a lesson in the creation of (metaphorical) power by the closer synchronization of these entities.
I extrapolate the implications of this as literally revealing a path leading to world peace.
In sum, I enjoy thought-provoking interpretations way more than thought-restricting interpretations.
I first heard of Bret couple times already in a very favourable light and he's on my read todo list.
The thing is that I have one very specific definition of resonance in my mind based on my line of work. Still I do believe it's always good to be open to different interpretations ...
Well, half of Sedona residents would agree. But that doesn't describe anything specific of the physical world that a post on physics (as the post appears to intend to be) would cover.