How's that old saying go? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 47 times, shame on me.
How's that old saying go? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 47 times, shame on me.
I've never seen a person who actually is familiar with Typescript say anything negative about it, and it has huge uptake in the open source community.
Ref Book: The New Kingmakers
"It’s hard to feel too sorry for SOAP’s creators, however — particularly if what one Microsoft developer told Tim O’Reilly is true: “It was actually a Microsoft objective to make [SOAP] sufficiently complex that only the tools would read and write this stuff,” he explained, “and not humans.”"
I guess my take is overall they earned high marks from the dev community despite whatever misses they may have had over the years.
I was addressing the phrasing and lack of objectivity of the Typescript statement. At no point did I discuss the merits of anti MS sentiment.
Yes I agree with you that MS has burnt people in the past. At the same time it's not binary so 100% of MS != evil.
also, even though the MS anti-sentiment didn't pop up out of nowhere, it's not relevant in the static-vs-dynamic typing discussion...
Unfortunately I can't hear that song anymore without picturing the opening scenes of CSI Miami.