"Tesla, in a statement issued late Wednesday, suggested the company chose to leave the probe."
Technically, that's sorta true. By releasing information and opinions about the ongoing investigation, Tesla decided not to be a part of it.
Technically, that's sorta true. By releasing information and opinions about the ongoing investigation, Tesla decided not to be a part of it.
"You can't fire me, I quit!"
Also laughable from Tesla's statement. "We are committed to transparency as a company, and NTSB was telling us we couldn't release information about AutoPilot, and that was unacceptable to us".
Huh, all those people looking for service manuals may be curious to hear about Tesla's corporate commitment to transparency.
Any 'artificially intelligent' car that can't avoid running straight into something solid right in front of it is dangerously stupid. Elon's age is starting to show.
The issue at play here is far larger than a car having a crash. The issue I was referring to is the actions of Tesla as they respond to the crash. That is cultural and it affects both the process of creating and releasing products as well as the process of responding to their failure. If your product can kill people, and lets be clear - cars can easily kill people SDV or not - you need to act like professionals when something happens. Playing the blame game, in public, and violating the expectations of a body like the NTSB shouldn't garner trust, no matter who is right at a technical level.
EDIT: fixed my abysmal grammar.
So instead, Asimov's Rule#1: "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."