American's national identity is wrapped up in founding of their government and throwing off "oppressive" European laws is at the center of that narrative.
Laws carry their culture. GDPR is, from an American perspective, an overworked mess designed to support a big bureaucracy. This side of the Atlantic, we'd do something slimmer, more reliant on privately-funded cases (and regulatory complaints) versus public ombudsmen, and better attuned to start-ups’ needs.
IMHO, as an EU citizen, an American perspective would be welcome. A text must fit the local hierarchy of norms and the local judicial system.
You may read this article related to this point of view : https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21739961-gdprs-premis...
doesn't exist
Both of these things are out of scope for you, no? I suppose you could vote with your shares if you own stock in Facebook...