Rogaway and Shrimpton specifically used collision resistance not implying preimage resistance as an example of the importance of definition and assumptions:
>Informal treatments of cryptographic hash functions can lead to a lot of ambiguity, with informal notions that might be formalized in very different ways and claims that might correspondingly be true or false. Consider, for example, the following quotes, taken from our favorite reference on cryptography [..] "collision resistance does not guarantee preimage resistance" - [0]
They go on to show the definitions under which collision resistance does and does not imply preimage resistance.