Look at the OP's profile. Manager at Pinterest. Theres no doubt the attack is disgenuous because said individual have skin in the game.
I usually don't mind if they disclose it upfront. But to hide it and present an argument as neutral is dishonest.
I usually don't mind if they disclose it upfront. But to hide it and present an argument as neutral is dishonest.
Here's a disclaimer: I worked at multiple Adtech companies in senior engineering positions.
I don't work on Pinterest's ads business and I'm not very familiar with that side of the company. I'm speaking as someone who runs ads on other sites to try and drive traffic to Pinterest.
Also, like the other poster said, an ad-hominem attack is a classic logic fallacy. You are criticizing who is saying it and did not bring up a single critique of my actual argument.