Tyranny, injustice and oppression were not simply eliminated at the end of WWII. And living today to witness the convenient virtue signalling about a historical artifact of a long-defeated tyrant, juxtaposed with the willingness to tolerate current injustice, is really sad.
But isn't that what made Nazi Germany possible? Our willingness to tolerate injustice, so long as it doesn't happen to us? Our desire to follow authority--to serve in the court of despots? That is the irony here, which calls to light the real meaning of this kind of virtue signalling: If we lived under the reign of any of those other tyrants, in Imperial Japan, Nazi Germany, or wherever, would we all suddenly be among activists, not just mere virtue signallers championing the virtues of our leaders?
I don't mean to come down hard on you personally; I just personally wish to see the conversation move away from moral grandstanding to moral responsibility.
1 - https://theintercept.com/2016/09/09/wolf-blitzer-is-worried-...
2 - https://www.npr.org/2015/06/03/411524156/in-search-of-the-re...
3 - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/responsibility-deflect...
4 - https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/health/us-suicide-rate...
5 - https://theintercept.com/2018/04/02/israel-killing-palestine...
You know more were murdered under the guise of the chinese communist flag?