any clarifications on what substance there is? this reads like a two minute hate of a d-list celebrity and i struggle to understand what makes it interesting in the hacker sense.
So yeah, there's a lot for people to rant and repeat about, but I think also some substance to consider, and maybe yield some insights about. We're asking users to make a conscious effort to eschew the former and go for the latter.
That seems true.
> The story contains complexity, for example in the relationships between the people involved, that makes it less predictable than the median.
There is complexity, but it's the pretty much the kind of complexity that has become a cookie-cutter template of harassment narratives in creative industries recently.
> It's a new variation in the ongoing shift in discourse about these behaviors
Is it, though? The dynamics seem to be nearly identical to many of the other narratives recently, differing only in the identity of the victims, perpetrator, and workplaces involved.
edit: To clarify, you may reasonably either like or dislike it, but to claim it's lacking substance is trivially demonstrably false.
This is Palanti(e)r journalism from them. Your comment suggests you didn't even click the link.